Terence S.-Y. Chen
Latitude Design Systems
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) models like ChatGPT are creating immense compute demands, driving data center bandwidth requirements beyond the limits of electrical interconnects. Silicon photonics provides a path to higher throughput and energy efficiency through the use of light. However, photonic IC design brings unique layout and modeling challenges requiring specialized tools. This paper examines how automated design platforms like Latitude Design Automation's PIC Studio, comprising modules for schematic capture, simulation, layout synthesis, and verification, facilitate the development of high-performance photonic systems to sustain future AI growth. We review the capabilities needed in a comprehensive photonic IC design automation solution.
Keywords: ChatGPT; silicon photonics; photonic systems; photonic IC
Introduction
The recent enthusiasm around AI chatbots like ChatGPT highlights the computational intensity of modern AI models, which utilize hundreds of billions of parameters and demand extensive hardware resources [1]. For example, the GPT-3 model behind ChatGPT contains 175 billion parameters, surpassing even the human brain's estimated capacity of 100 billion parameters [2]. To handle workloads of this scale, hyperscale data centers with thousands of servers and petabyte-scale storage have emerged. However, the traditional copper interconnects between components in these data centers are insufficient to provide the requisite bandwidths [3].
Using optical signals instead of electronics, silicon photonic ICs can enable order-of-magnitude higher throughputs. Photonics thereby represents a pivotal building block for future high-performance computing systems [4]. Silicon photonics leverages the materials and fabrication processes of the semiconductor industry, while harnessing the high speeds and bandwidths of photonics [5]. However, photonic circuits have distinct layout and modeling considerations necessitating specialized design automation tools tailored for photonics [6].
This paper examines the drivers and methodologies for photonic IC design automation. We emphasize integrated platforms like Latitude Design Automation's PIC Studio suite that addresses the end-to-end development needs of complex photonic chips and interconnections [7]. We discuss how automated flows can facilitate the design of high-bandwidth photonic interconnects and systems to sustain the growth of data-intensive AI applications.
Background on Photonic IC Design Challenges
Unlike digital electronic circuits with standardized cell libraries, each photonic component has a unique layout and performance tied to its geometry and materials [6]. Photonic ICs also face challenges like layer restrictions, sensitivity to fabrication variations, and modeling optical phenomena not present in conventional circuit simulators. Layout tools must account for curvilinear waveguide geometries while meeting foundry design rules. Compact device models are needed to predict system performance prior to fabrication. These distinctive considerations necessitate design automation technologies specifically customized for photonics applications [6].
Foundry-provided process design kits (PDKs) encapsulate critical information like validated component libraries, layout rules, and optical models tailored for a fabrication process [8]. However, immature PDKs pose adoption barriers. Interoperability gaps also exist between PDKs and tools from different vendors. Lack of standards similarly hinders component reuse and tool integration [6]. Developing predictive photonic ICs further requires statistical modeling of manufacturing variations absent in traditional electronic design flows [9]. Addressing these photonics-specific design automation needs promises to accelerate innovation in this key enabling technology.
Automated Photonic IC Design Platforms
To streamline photonic IC development, integrated design automation solutions like Latitude's PIC Studio provide a comprehensive environment comprising schematic capture, simulation, layout synthesis, and verification [7]. These tools automate the conversion of high-level photonic circuit specifications to physical layouts ready for fabrication. PIC Studio's core capabilities include:
pLogic: Schematic editor for system-level photonic circuit design, leveraging foundry PDK component libraries [7].
pSim: Multi-engine photonic circuit simulator for frequency- and time-domain analyses using analytical and compact device models [7].
Advanced SDL: Automated schematic-driven layout synthesis tool to generate manufacturable photonic IC layouts adhering to foundry design rules [7].
PhotoCAD: Interactive layout editor for curvilinear photonic waveguide routing [7].
The combination of hierarchical design capture, PDK-based circuit simulation, and correct-by-construction layout synthesis provides a complete design-through-manufacturing flow analogous to mature electronic IC EDA. PIC Studio also allows co-simulation of photonics and electronics within a unified environment [7]. These capabilities to address the unique considerations in photonic IC design lower barriers and accelerate development. This integrated suite enables correct-by-construction layout generation from photonic circuit specifications. Tight integration with industry-standard EDA tools like L-Edit and Calibre DRC facilitates verification and signoff. PIC Studio is complemented by end-to-end services supporting PDK development, customized design consulting, and silicon photonic training programs. Adoption by leading universities, research institutions, and electronics companies demonstrates the comprehensive capabilities of this next-generation platform to address the emerging needs of silicon photonics.
PDK Components and Modeling Needs
To enable practical photonic IC design, foundry PDKs must provide comprehensive component libraries and optical models [8]. PDKs incorporate information like:
Validated parametric component generators covering devices like waveguides, couplers, modulators, and detectors.
Layout rules and design constraints capturing fabrication process limitations.
Layer definitions mirroring the foundry process flow.
Compact optical models for components to enable circuit simulation.
Electrical models to simulate active devices and interconnects.
Variability-aware models capturing nanoscale process fluctuations.
The component libraries encapsulate proven building blocks specific to the target process. The optical models must be thoroughly calibrated and validated against foundry metrology data. Statistical simulation techniques are needed to assess manufacturing variability and production yield [9]. Immature PDKs with incomplete or inaccurate information pose barriers to reliably designing photonic ICs. Close collaboration between foundries, designers, and EDA vendors is essential to create comprehensive PDKs for mainstream adoption.
Interfacing Photonics and Electronics
Many photonic IC applications require integrating photonics with electronics, such as electrical input signals driving optical modulators and transimpedance amplifiers receiving photodetected outputs. Co-design techniques must enable concurrent design of the photonic and electronic subsystems. Integrated photonic-electronic platforms allow system-level co-simulation of electrical and optical components using consistent PDK device models [10].
Standardized interfaces between electronic and photonic simulators can validate system performance from signal generation through optical transmission and detection. Co-simulation reveals interactions between the domains while guiding co-optimization [11]. RF modeling extensions are necessary to simulate high-frequency electrical effects. Unified design environments promise to accelerate integrated electro-optic system development spanning nanophotonic, transistor-level, and package-level design [12].
Physical Design and Manufacturing Considerations
While the schematic-driven design flow provides benefits of hierarchy and abstraction, the photonic circuit must ultimately convert to a tangible manufactured layout. Physical implementation poses challenges including [6]:
Curvilinear waveguide geometries require true smooth curves, not rectilinear electronics routing. This complicates layout generation and verification.
Optical connections are restricted to a few routing layers unlike multilayer electronics metallization stacks. Waveguide crossings also induce losses.
Uniformly high layout pattern densities are required to avoid lithography defects. Non-functional dummy fills consume space while complicating routing.
Foundry design rules governing minimum feature sizes must be obeyed for successful fabrication. Customized DRC rule decks are essential to verify photonic IC layouts.
Optical ports and efficient fiber coupling structures need incorporation. System-level co-packaging of photonics with driver and receiver electronics must also be considered.
Addressing constraints related to physical implementation and manufacturing compatibility is vital to harnessing the fabrication capabilities offered by silicon photonics. Tools must become lithography and variation-aware. Foundry partnerships to develop mature, comprehensive PDKs can significantly enhance design efficiency. Solutions automating the daunting task of physical design for complex photonic ICs will also be enabling.
Applications of Photonic ICs
Silicon photonic ICs are poised to transform industries from communications to computing to healthcare [13]. Some key application drivers include:
Scaling microprocessor interconnects as copper traces hit bandwidth limits even on advanced process nodes [14]. Photonic I/O promises performance gains.
Enabling fully optical networks with complex modulation, wavelength division multiplexing (WMDM), and high port counts [15]. Programmable integrated optical circuits allow reconfigurability.
Miniaturizing sensors for biomedical applications through photonic integration [16]. Lab-on-a-chip devices benefit from nanophotonic advances.
Specialized computing paradigms including optical neural networks and analog photonic co-processors [17]. Neuromorphic photonics is a growing research field.
Augmenting electronics with photonics in next-generation computing architectures for gains in throughput, latency, and power efficiency [18].
Quantum photonic circuits for emerging applications in computing, metrology, cryptography and communication [19].
Continued innovation on integrated optical components, subsystems, and manufacturing processes will enable these myriad applications. Photonic ICs synthesized using robust design automation platforms offer an avenue to sustainably support future bandwidth growth driven by AI, cloud computing, and big data analytics.
Challenges and Opportunities
While silicon photonic design automation has adopted electronic design concepts, some gaps persist relative to traditional EDA that need resolution [6]:
Lack of standards hampers interoperability, IP reuse and tool integration. Defining photonic equivalents of electronics standards like Verilog-A can help.
Dedicated photonic-centric tools incorporating layout, simulation, verification, manufacturing checks, co-design etc. within a unified automated environment can enhance productivity.
Modeling complex optical phenomena like nonlinearity and noise on electronics-focused simulators remains challenging and requires specialized techniques.
Statistical analysis, design centering and optimization methods considering manufacturing variation need enhancement for yield-aware design.
Foundry PDKs with comprehensive component libraries, verified interconnect performance data, and robust multi-domain (electrical, optical, thermal) models are still maturing.
Addressing these gaps presents research opportunities and underscores the need for collaboration between academia, foundries, EDA vendors, system integrators and end-users to mature silicon photonic design automation. Shared standards, interoperable tools, and qualified PDKs promise to significantly enhance design efficiency, performance and reliability for this emerging technology.
Conclusion
In summary, exponential AI compute complexity is driving bandwidth demands beyond electrical interconnects’ limits. Silicon photonics delivers order-of-magnitude throughput gains to sustain future systems. However, specialized design automation is imperative to harness the potential of photonic ICs. Integrated schematic-driven design platforms augmenting traditional EDA with photonics-specific functionality facilitate high-performance optical interconnect development.
Mainstreaming photonic solutions requires design productivity approaching electronics, a gap advanced tools can bridge. With sustained improvements to automated flows and maturing PDKs, silicon photonics is poised for a pivotal role powering next-generation computing. However, work remains to transition more fabrication processes to high-volume manufacturing and engage the broader design community through accessible tools and resources. The next decade will prove pivotal as research outcomes translate into deployed products and applications across industries.
References
[1] A. Vaswani et al., “Attention is all you need,” in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2017.
[2] T.B. Brown et al., “Language models are few-shot learners,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2020.
[3] S. Bernabé et al., “Silicon photonics for terabit/s communication in data centers and exascale computers,” Solid-State Electronics, Volume 179, 2021.
[4] D. Thomson et al., “Roadmap on silicon photonics,” Journal of Optics, vol. 18, no. 7, p. 073003, 2016.
[5] L. Chrostowski and M. Hochberg, Silicon Photonics Design: From Devices to Systems. Cambridge University Press, 2015.
[6] A. Rahim et al., “Expanding the Silicon Photonics Portfolio With Silicon Nitride Photonic Integrated Circuits,” Journal of Lightwave Technology, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 423-434, 2021.
[7] Latitude Design Automation, “PIC Studio”, Online, 2022. https://latitudeda.com/solution/flow/PIC%20Studio
[8] T. Chen, “Silicon Photonics Process Design Kit (PDK) Creation Checklist,” Latitude Whitepaper, 2023.
[9] SiemensEDA, “Design for manufacturability using CompoundTek’s PDK and Siemens-Ansys photonic layout-driven design flow,” Online, 2021.
[10] Y. Shi et al., "Silicon photonics for high-capacity data communications," Photon. Res. 10, A106-A134, 2022.
[11] N. Margalit et al., “Perspective on the future of silicon photonics and electronics,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 31 May 2021.
[12] A. V. Krishnamoorthy et al., "Energy-Efficient Photonics in Future High-Connectivity Computing Systems," Journal of Lightwave Technology, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 889-900, 15 Feb.15, 2015.
[13] M. Hochberg et al., “Silicon photonics: the next fabless semiconductor industry,” IEEE Solid-State Circuits Magazine, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 48-58, 2013.
[14] A. Biberman et al., “Photonic Network-on-Chip Architectures Using Multilayer Deposited Silicon Materials for High-Performance Chip Multiprocessors,” ACM Journal on Emerging Technologies in Computing Systems, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 1-25, 2011.
[15] D. Nguyen, D. et al., “Self-controlling photonic-on-chip networks with deep reinforcement learning,“ Scientific Reports 11, 2021.
[16] K. De Vos et al., “Silicon-on-Insulator Microring Resonator for Sensitive and Label-Free Biosensing,” Optics Express, vol. 15, no. 12, pp. 7610, 2007.
[17] A. N. Tait et al., "Neuromorphic photonic networks using silicon photonic weight banks," Scientific Reports, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 7430, 2017.
[18] M. Georgas et al., “Addressing link-level design tradeoffs for integrated photonic interconnects,” in Custom Integrated Circuits Conference, 2011.
[19] J. Wang et al., “Integrated photonic quantum technologies,” Nature Photonics, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 273-284, 2020.
Opmerkingen